Public evidence profile
Civil Engineers Limited
Planning history
27 public planning applications
How this score is worked out
Review volumeLow · 0
CredentialsNo credentials shown yet
Verified planning history
Based on rating, review volume, independent sources and credential evidence. Evidence context, not a guarantee of workmanship.
Trust at a glance
1 checkWhat we can verify about Civil Engineers Limited
Each card sums up one thing we can check from public sources. Open it for the full detail and the named source. This is evidence context, not a guarantee.
See the full verification checklist for Civil Engineers Limited →Planning history
Civil Engineers Limited’s real planning history from public planning applications, showing where they’ve worked and how often schemes were approved. · Active 2012–2019
approval rate48%
planning applications27
approved schemes11
councils worked in8
What they work on
The kinds of project Civil Engineers Limited has filed planning applications for.
- Loft conversion2
- Rear extension22
- Extension25
- Outbuilding / garden room1
- Porch1
- Demolition1
Where they’ve worked
Each pin is a planning application, coloured by the council decision we found.
Council experience
- Newham · 8 applications since 2014See planning experience in Newham
- Barnet · 7 applications since 2015See planning experience in Barnet
- Barking and Dagenham · 5 applications since 2016See planning experience in Barking and Dagenham
- Greenwich · 2 applications since 2013See planning experience in Greenwich
- Tower Hamlets · 2 applications since 2012See planning experience in Tower Hamlets
- Enfield · 1 application since 2015See planning experience in Enfield
- Hammersmith and Fulham · 1 application since 2012See planning experience in Hammersmith and Fulham
- Southwark · 1 application since 2019See planning experience in Southwark
Recent planning applications
- RefusedWorkshop At Rear Of, 386 Ripple Road, Barking, Barking And Dagenham,Erection of a three storey building to accommodate five self contained dwellings.
- Withdrawn275A OLD KENT ROAD, LONDON, SE1 5LULoft conversion and third floor rear extension to accommodate a two bed self-contained dwelling.
- Approved167 Bennetts Castle Lane, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM8 3YJErection of first floor rear extension.
- Refused167 Bennetts Castle Lane, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM8 3YJErection of first floor rear extension to existing house, and erection of two storey side/rear extension to create additional 2 bedroom house.
- Refused5 Shandy Street, London, E1 4LXNotification for Prior Approval under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development Order) 2015 for a rear extension extending 6m beyond the rear wall of the house, with a max height of 2.9m and eaves height of 2.8m
- Refused21 Selvage Lane London NW7 3SSA single storey rear extension with a proposed depth of 6 metres, an eaves height of 2.8 metres and a maximum height of 2.9 metres.
- Refused21 Selvage Lane London NW7 3SSSingle storey rear extension with a proposed depth of 6 metres from original rear wall, eaves height of 2.8 metres and maximun height of 3 metres.
- Approved43 Clacton Road East Ham London E6 3ERProposed ground floor and first floor rear extension.
Show all 27 planning applicationsShow fewer planning applications
- Refused21 Selvage Lane London NW7 3SSSingle storey rear extension with a proposed depth of 6.0 metres from original rear wall, eaves height of 2.8 metres and maximum height of 2.9 metres
- Approved43 Clacton Road East Ham London E6 3ERPrior notification application for the construction of a single storey rear extension. The details submitted are as follows: The proposed extension will extend beyond the rear wall by 5.3m, the maximum height of the proposed extension from the natural ground level is 2.9m and the height at eaves level of the proposed extension measured from the natural ground level is 2.8m.
- Refused21 Selvage Lane London NW7 3SSSingle storey rear extension with a proposed depth of 6 metres from original rear wall, eaves height of 2.8 metres and maximum height of 2.9 metres
- Refused135 Bittacy Rise London NW7 2HJSingle storey rear extension (Retrospective Application)
- Approved62 Valence Circus, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM8 3LXApplication for prior approval of proposed single storey rear extension (depth: 6.0 metres beyond original rear wall; height to eaves: 2.7 metres and maximum height: 2.8 metres).
- Approved12 Listowel Road, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM10 7QPApplication for prior approval of proposed single storey rear extension (depth: 6.0 metres; height to eaves: 2.6 metres and maximum height: 2.7 metres).
- Refused135 Bittacy Rise London NW7 2HJSingle storey rear extension with a proposed depth of 6 metres from original rear wall, eaves height of 2.8 metres and maximum height of 3.4 metres
- Refused71 Portway Stratford London E15 3QJSingle Storey Rear Extension and Ground floor internal renovation
- Withdrawn71 Portway Stratford London E15 3QJProposed single storey rear extension and internal renovation on ground floor.
- Approved135 Bittacy Rise London NW7 2HJSingle storey rear extension with a proposed depth of 6 metres from original rear wall, eaves height of 2.7 metres and maximum height of 2.8 metres
- Approved29 Dawlish Avenue London N13 4HPSingle storey rear extension 8m deep x 2.9m high (2.8m high to eaves).
- Refused30 Neville Road Forest Gate London E7 9QXErection of single storey rear extension to ground floor flat
- Refused108 Broad Walk, Kidbrooke, London, SE3 8NDErection of a single storey front extension together with the construction of a front porch and partial conversion of existing garage to habitable room.
- Approved112 Flanders Road London E6 6BNRetrospective Planning for a Rear Extension and proposed alteration to materials on side elevation
- Withdrawn112 Flanders Road East Ham London E6 6BNRetrospective application for single storey rear extension
- Approved112 Flanders Road East Ham London E6 6BNRetention of rear dormer extension subject to alterations.
- Approved108 Broad Walk, Kidbrooke, London, SE3 8NDErection of a single storey outbuilding.
- Withdrawn2 - 4 Maclise Road London W14 0PRErection of an additional floor at roof level in connection with the creation of 2 x self-contained flats; erection of an extension on top of the existing back addition at second floor and third floor level to no. 4 Maclise Road.
- Approved24 Marshfield Street, London E14 3HQDemolition of existing single storey rear extension (unauthorized) and replacement with a new single storey rear extension
3 of these applications were submitted after the work had started (retrospective consent).
Reviews · public evidence
What customers say
These review totals are published independently on public review sources, not testimonials this business chose to show. We show the aggregate rating, review volume, and source attribution we hold so you can weigh the evidence yourself.
No rating
Where these reviews are published
Your own checks
What to check before you hire
Worth checking yourself
Only a few public reviews are shown. Ask for recent references you can contact.
No credentials are shown here and the business has not claimed this profile. Ask to see certificates and insurance directly.
Verify at the sourceCheck them yourself
"Architect" is a title protected by law - only people on the official Architects Register (held by ARB) may use it. Confirm they're on it before you commission a design.
Check the Architects RegisterOnly someone on the Architects Registration Board (ARB) register may legally call themselves an 'architect' in the UK. Ask for their ARB number and check it free at arb.org.uk. An 'architectural designer' or 'technologist' is a different, unregistered role (often capable, but not the same protection).
Agree how they charge before any work starts (a percentage of the build cost, a fixed fee, or an hourly rate) and exactly which stages it covers (concept design, planning application, building-regulations drawings, work on site), so there are no surprises later.
Confirm what they will actually handle versus what is excluded (the planning application, the building-control drawings, and whether they will administer the builder's contract on site), and get it, and a portfolio of similar projects, in writing.
Want an extra legitimacy check? Run the Cowboy Checker on Civil Engineers Limited before you contact them.
Run Cowboy Checker →