Imported reviews stay imported
A public review from a named source remains source evidence. It does not become a MyTrustedTraders review, endorsement, guarantee, or paid badge.
The rules behind what we show, claim, and refuse to overclaim.
MyTrustedTraders helps homeowners judge public evidence faster. It does not replace judgement with an unexplained score. Trust Score is evidence context, not a guarantee of workmanship. This is the contract for evidence, limits, corrections, and trust language.
Named public sources
CHCheckatradeTRTrustATraderMYMyBuilderRARatedPeople
The named sources stay visible. We name the review sources and registries instead of asking you to trust a black box.
7,915,705Source-reported public reviews tracked
1,475,344Trader profiles tracked
118,010Trader profiles ready to browse
22+Named sources checked
Source boundaries
Trust language only works when each source keeps its meaning.
The public site should make evidence legible without blurring the source. Imported reviews, owner claims, registry checks, rights requests, and commercial tools each mean something different. See how we check the reviews we show before treating them as trust.
Verification means a checkable source
Credential, company, licence, and registry claims should name the check behind them so users can inspect what was verified.
Claiming does not change meaning
A trader can claim a profile, but claim status must not rewrite review history, source quality, ranking, or trust language.
Corrections stay visible as a right
Incorrectly matched profiles, harmful data, and privacy concerns all have a clear correction option.
Our recognitions cannot become their own evidence
Evidence-recognition editions are built separately from profile evidence and publish their comparison group, cutoff, sources, tie-breakers and limitations. Receiving one cannot change the evidence shown, Trust Score, search position, or the independent third-party awards shown on a profile.
The standard
What every page should make legible.
Why a trader appears should never be a mystery.
Search, chat, and shortlist pages should make the reason clear: job match, location fit, review depth, credentials, named sources, and visible cautions.
Every strong claim needs a named source.
If a trader is described as verified, recent, active, or credentialed, the product should reveal the named source, registry, or check behind that claim.
Verified facts and imported signals are not the same thing.
Registry matches, business-status checks, and current credentials must read differently from imported reviews and third-party listings.
Missing or stale evidence should stay visible.
The job is not to make every profile look polished. The job is to show where the evidence is strong, weak, fresh, stale, or unresolved.
Money must stay separate from trust.
Claiming a profile, using business tools, or spending with MyTrustedTraders must not buy rank, evidence recognition, badges, or trust language.
Public trust copy stops at evidence.
We can explain confidence and caution. We cannot imply workmanship guarantees or features that do not yet exist in the product.
On-page checks
The questions each page should answer.
Why this trader is here
Search and chat should show that a trader appears because visible evidence matches the job, trade, and location.
What backs the profile
Profiles should reveal source names, checks, freshness, and cautions so the trust story can be inspected.
How a profile can be challenged
Traders need a clear way to correct identity, review, registry, or incorrectly linked profiles.
Boundaries
What we will not claim on the public site.
- We do not claim a trader shown here is personally approved by MyTrustedTraders.
- We do not let paid placement or claiming a profile change public ranking or badges.
- An evidence recognition is a dated editorial result under a published method, not certification, endorsement, or a promise of workmanship.
- We do not make guarantee claims that public evidence cannot support.
- We do not guarantee completeness, workmanship, or outcome quality from public evidence alone.
- We do expect homeowners to inspect the evidence and verify before hiring.
Governance rule
Trust has to be explainable, inspectable, and challengeable.
MyTrustedTraders can help people move faster through public evidence, but it should never ask them to accept a black-box trust claim or a paid shortcut to credibility.
- Search and profile pages should answer why this trader appears here.
- Source names, timestamps, credentials, and gaps should stay close to the claim they support.
- Commercial tools can fund the business, but not public ranking, badges, review visibility, or evidence language.
- Editorial evidence recognition must be reproducible, free, challengeable, and isolated from the evidence and ranking systems it describes.
- If a claim cannot be explained to a homeowner or challenged by a trader, it should not be presented as trust.
Inspect the evidence, then inspect the limits.
Use the evidence to compare quickly, then verify before hiring.