Hoot Architecture

Public evidence profile

Hoot Architecture

Durham
5.05 reviews in the current record
Public profile launch summary

Launch summary

Hoot Architecture

Best Residential Architecture Practice (North East England) awarded by Build, July 2020 Hoot is an architectural practice based in Durham. We are passionate about creating exceptional buildings and places, whatever the size or budget. The practice is led by Stu Kent who an architect with many years working in residential and commercial design both in the UK and abroad. The first stage of all projects is listening closely to our clients to understand their aspirations and requirements, only once this is done can we start drawing. All projects are designed using 3D computer modelling which allows us to thoroughly test concepts and refine the small details. The 3D models also assist clients to fully visualise and understand the designs as they develop. Our rigorous approach leads to designs that are both creative and affordable.

Public review evidenceLast review Review dates not availableSource refresh
Proof pending

Public proof summary

MTT is still building the plain-language proof summary for this profile.

Proof gaps

Visible limitations on this record

3

These are evidence or response-routing gaps, not misconduct findings or paid-placement signals.

No verified credential shownNo verified endorsements shownUnclaimed on MyTrustedTraders

Public profile only

Public profile only. This trader hasn't claimed their profile on MyTrustedTraders yet.

This trader cannot receive quote requests or project invites here until the business owner claims the profile.

Review evidence

Review coverage and highlights

5
Review depth5
Source platforms2
Loaded sample0
Latest dated reviewDates unavailable
HouzzSource profile linked
houzzSource profile linked

Review text is still being materialised for this profile; the source totals remain visible above.

Source-named checks

Trust checks and red flags

Public evidence shown
Public review evidenceLast review Review dates not availableHouzz
Professional endorsements

Endorsements from other traders

0

No public professional endorsements are shown for this profile yet.

Reviews

Customer review evidence

5 total

Source-refresh labels elsewhere show when MTT last checked the record.

Source profiles

Public platform links

Needs 40 more points

Qualifying Score Detail

20/100

Strict supply qualification uses source spread, review depth, endorsements, credentials, and contactability. Commercial plan state is not counted.

20 of 100 points20%

Strict qualifying threshold: 60 points.

Review platform presence0/25
Reviews 100+0/20
Peer endorsements0/15
Planning history0/10
Verified credential0/10
Active business10/10
Phone number10/10
GapReview platform presence

1 linked review platform found; need 2.

Link more review-platform profiles so homeowners can verify you across multiple sources.

GapReviews 100+

5 reviews and 5.0 average rating; need 100 reviews and 4.0+.

Request more verified reviews and protect your average rating across linked platforms.

GapPeer endorsements

0 endorsements on file; need 3.

Ask traders you have worked with to endorse you from the endorsements dashboard.

GapPlanning history

No planning history is linked to this profile yet.

Link recent planning evidence or architect-backed project history where available.

GapVerified credential

No verified credential on file yet.

Submit a Gas Safe, NICEIC, NAPIT, FENSA, CERTASS, FMB, CSCS, or Companies House verification.

PassedActive business

Operating status is unknown.

PassedPhone number

Phone listed: 01916456789.

Next qualification actions
Review platform presence

Link more review-platform profiles so homeowners can verify you across multiple sources.

View score page
Reviews 100+

Request more verified reviews and protect your average rating across linked platforms.

Request reviews
Peer endorsements

Ask traders you have worked with to endorse you from the endorsements dashboard.

Open endorsements
Planning history

Link recent planning evidence or architect-backed project history where available.

Review score
Planning evidence

Nearby projects

Checking local planning records.